<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Social Marketing by Michelle MacPhearson - Latest Comments in #?? In Google In 3 Days!</title><link>http://michellemacphearson.disqus.com/</link><description>Integrating social media and SEO to your internet marketing efforts.</description><atom:link href="https://michellemacphearson.disqus.com/in_google_in_3_days/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:20:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: #?? In Google In 3 Days!</title><link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/in-google-in-3-days/#comment-13891957</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the video--I always understand things better if they are laid out for me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Pearson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:20:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #?? In Google In 3 Days!</title><link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/in-google-in-3-days/#comment-13891956</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Michelle, quick update. Now in position #3 for keywords! This is incredible. Cheers!&lt;br&gt;Peter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheap Websites</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:33:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #?? In Google In 3 Days!</title><link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/in-google-in-3-days/#comment-13891955</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Michelle,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is your system automated, or is it just some information on how to set up backlinks? I already know how to get one way links with a lot of work, so I'd hate to spend francs on something I am already doing...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lamarde Perro</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 12:24:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #?? In Google In 3 Days!</title><link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/in-google-in-3-days/#comment-13891954</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Michelle, I said I'd give an update on my sites positioning after using 30 minute backlinks. &lt;br&gt;Well four of five days after creating my toolbar and following all the steps to promote it the results are good. For my target keyphrase on &lt;a href="http://Google.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Google.com"&gt;Google.com&lt;/a&gt; I'm up from #10 to #5. I haven't made any backlinks elsewhere as part of the experiment. Looks like it works! &lt;br&gt;It'll be interesting to see if it maintains position over the next week or two. Who knows, with any luck it'll continue to improve and head for number #1. :) Cheers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheap Websites</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 02:30:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #?? In Google In 3 Days!</title><link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/in-google-in-3-days/#comment-13891953</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Steve - Yes, that keyword is probably a bit ambitious to start with - for any link building campaign.  Look for a long tail keyword without so much competition that still contains the main keyphrase you want to rank for one day.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I.E. the keyword you'd *really* like is "apple iphone" - a more attainable keyphrase could be "custom apple iphone hacks."  That second phrase still contains your main keyword phrase, so you're gaining rank for it while actually working with a phrase you have a chance at, initially.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(That's an example, I didn't check the numbers on it, obviously).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michelle MacPhearson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:17:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #?? In Google In 3 Days!</title><link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/in-google-in-3-days/#comment-13891952</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Scott - I don't "use" anything on this blog actually.  No promotion strategy.  It's enough to keep up with writing it, LOL!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michelle MacPhearson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:11:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #?? In Google In 3 Days!</title><link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/in-google-in-3-days/#comment-13891951</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The 30minutebacklinks 'strategy' is wonderful - combine it with the material Ed Dale is promoting and you have one huge, powerful beast. I cannot fault it; I KNOW it works, and it works well. :-o&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Harrison Gee</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 18:16:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #?? In Google In 3 Days!</title><link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/in-google-in-3-days/#comment-13891950</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Michelle, if 30 minute backlinks is so great how come you don't use it for your own blog?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On Yahoo, you only have 514 links to your site and most of those are your own posts, none of which are from software sites. Your site has been around for 2 years! Shouldn't you be at least in the tens of thousands by now?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, while Ray's comment was out of line, he makes a good point. I noticed in your affiliate video that you did "cool tattoos" in quotes, something 99% of Google searchers aren't going to do...for 'cool tattoos' without quotes it's a whole different story.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Please address the above as I do think your backlinking scheme is quite brilliant, but it's kind of a red flag when you're not using this scheme on your own blog, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 22:02:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #?? In Google In 3 Days!</title><link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/in-google-in-3-days/#comment-13891949</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Michelle,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I made the toolbar last night and uploaded. Trying not to keep check position all day. I was already on Google position #10 when I uploaded the files as you directed. If it goes 5 or above I'll have to thank you for that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Should know within a few days. Great videos and easy to follow tutorials. Cheers Michelle.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheap Websites</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:32:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #?? In Google In 3 Days!</title><link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/in-google-in-3-days/#comment-13891948</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just bought a couple of domains and I guess I can use this method to see if it works. I am hesitant because Google has been erratic about crawling one of my sites and I can't understand why.  I'm going to get your product and let you know in a week or two what happened.&lt;br&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Business Loans</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:30:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #?? In Google In 3 Days!</title><link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/in-google-in-3-days/#comment-13891947</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, bought your system, did my first campaign this week, but competition for my keyword is 16,000,000!!!! I guess that's a bit ambitious, should I pick a long tail keyword instead?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Porter</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:28:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #?? In Google In 3 Days!</title><link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/in-google-in-3-days/#comment-13891946</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder of 30 min back links is anything different than just submitting sites... Which I can do myself... Is there anything automated about the link submission?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Best Website hosting company</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:55:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #?? In Google In 3 Days!</title><link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/in-google-in-3-days/#comment-13891945</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@ Fistuk &amp;amp; MicroNicheFinder - The rank at another test site, the tattoos one (not linking so as not to skew results, but you can get the URL in the &lt;a href="http://30minutebacklinks.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="30minutebacklinks.com"&gt;30minutebacklinks.com&lt;/a&gt; homepage video) has held steady for about 4 weeks now.  Of course, I don't know what Google will do in the future, but so far, so good.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They way 30Minutebacklinks builds links is completely natural and accepted practice, so I think that helps.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I ALWAYS suggest that one get links from as many sources as possible though.  I haven't done that with these example sites, I'm trying to keep the experiments "clean."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@Ryan, Adam, Alex, Martin, Apire, Karrie - Yay!  I'm so happy for all of you!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@Bluerunner - I *love* the TDC!  Ed &amp;amp; Dan are fantastic, and you're learning from some great guys.  30MinuteBacklinks is a wonderful compliment to what they're teaching.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michelle MacPhearson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:08:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #?? In Google In 3 Days!</title><link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/in-google-in-3-days/#comment-13891944</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Michelle,&lt;br&gt;I am going to view the video as soon as I figure what happened to the sound on my machine. I would like to see how it compares to what was learned at TDC.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bluerunner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:25:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #?? In Google In 3 Days!</title><link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/in-google-in-3-days/#comment-13891943</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Michelle,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have had a website to page one in 2-3 days myself, and it stayed there... For about a week then fell off into oblivion - then returned to the coveted number one position. I have achieved page one status many times in relatively short periods. However - Don't you think that it's a little pre-mature to lead people to think that google is done dancing around your new site?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Micro Niche Finder</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:01:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #?? In Google In 3 Days!</title><link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/in-google-in-3-days/#comment-13891942</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats Michelle on the new success! I am pretty sure that the 30 Min Backlinks works...Planning to test it soon.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Davion | Secrets of Affiliate </dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:32:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #?? In Google In 3 Days!</title><link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/in-google-in-3-days/#comment-13891941</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow Michelle, that is wonderful. I have to say, I have used your 30 minutes backlinks method for a couple of my own sites (including my Tampa SEO company's site) and it really works well. Thanks so much!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karrie Pettit</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:45:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #?? In Google In 3 Days!</title><link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/in-google-in-3-days/#comment-13891940</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very True.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've had similar results.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Can I get multiple 30 minute Backlinks Capture pages. If so how?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyway great product!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.easywealthfire.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:42:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #?? In Google In 3 Days!</title><link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/in-google-in-3-days/#comment-13891939</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Those are fantastic results. I'll have to try this out on some domains that I own but haven't done anything with yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aspire</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:53:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #?? In Google In 3 Days!</title><link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/in-google-in-3-days/#comment-13891938</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Michelle, I got bought 30 mintues backlinks 2 days ago, and your videos are great!  Very easy to use.  This new post make me very excited.  I'll let you know how it works for me!&lt;br&gt;Adam Libman&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">backstage passes</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:07:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #?? In Google In 3 Days!</title><link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/in-google-in-3-days/#comment-13891937</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Michelle,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Those are great results! I'm a lazy guy myself and spend just a few minutes at the time and only use one or two pieces of soft using your method but results are staggering!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On my own blog a reader asked for proof and I had to do a research to show results - to my amazement  I discovered that almost every result onfirst 2 pages of Google point to my blog in some way - indirect points, 2 hop access but still great :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your product works wonders and thank you!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:24:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #?? In Google In 3 Days!</title><link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/in-google-in-3-days/#comment-13891936</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Michelle!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Alex put me on to you and your book (SMD - good book, by the way...)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ok, girl.  This is the FIRST comment I've ever placed on your site - so be warned - I'm am BLUNTLY HONEST!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So hold on to your chair...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I watched your video.  Ranking in 3 days, eh?  Ok.  Let's see about that, shall we???&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So I go to Google (US version, not Canada) and enter the same keyword you did: tatting patterns; no quotes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sure enough, your site is there, at #6.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But what's this.  36,000 piddly-ass websites?  Without quotes!!??&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's NOTHING!  A *monkey* could rank on the first page, of a crappy keyword with so little competition... that UNQUOTED, it's only got 36,000 "competitors"!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Alright then.  Let's REALLY put this girl "in her place".  Let's try running her keyword WITH QUOTES - and when it comes up with a pathetic 500 websites - I can really go after her!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So I enter into Google-US, the same keyword you did: tatting patterns; but WITH quotes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Uh oh.  What's this??  55,000 websites???&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;YIKES!  That's SERIOUS "competition".  It's DAMN TOUGH to rank for a keyword, with 55,000 QUOTED competitors!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But wait!  I'll bet she's now #205 or something - now that I'm only listing quoted "direct" Google-matching sites.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's 6am here on the East Coast (about 1.5 hours after you posted this video), and it'll probably take me all night - but when I find her at #205 - I can really go after her!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Uh oh.  What's this??  NUMBER FOUR!!???&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;She's ranking FRICKIN' FOURTH, after THREE DAYS, for a keyphrase with FIFTY-FIVE THOUSAND quoted competitors?????&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Doh!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I JUST HUMILIATED MYSELF!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Michelle... Michelle... can you ever forgive me for doubting you?&lt;br&gt;[Sound of male bodybuilder, bowing down and kissing the toes, of skinny little girl...]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ray the Canuck&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;P.S.  Michelle.  Why don't you edit your post, and show both the keyphrase and the name of your domain prominently in writing, so everyone can verify this for themselves.  :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;P.P.S.  And uh... Michelle?  While your busy editing, I'll just slither out of the room... quietly...&lt;br&gt;[sound of humiliated shuffling]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;;)&lt;br&gt;Ray&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ray the Canuck</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:15:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #?? In Google In 3 Days!</title><link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/in-google-in-3-days/#comment-13891935</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's great but the nature of the sandbox (that you are reffering to in the video) will be pronounced after a couple of weeks.&lt;br&gt;From my experience, for a totaly new site, if you acquire too many links, too fast, you get ranked quickly but after 2 weeks you get sandboxed for 8-12 monthes.&lt;br&gt;In other words, if you want a complete case stady you should post the same results after 3-4 weeks.&lt;br&gt;Anyway I'm crossing my fingers for you since getting sandboxed is realy a Bi...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fistuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:07:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #?? In Google In 3 Days!</title><link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/in-google-in-3-days/#comment-13891934</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent Michelle. I can definately see the power of 30 minute backlinks! I purchased it recently, have watched the videos but still haven't taken action yet! (Recently I have been bogged down with all the small stuff) This has prompted me to use it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for sharing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Shamus</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 05:41:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>